|
|
|
|
M.S. in Horticulture, Study emphasis: Technology Assisted Learning TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY, College Station, TX GPR: 3.875
B.S. in Horticulture, Study emphasis: Urban Horticulture and Landscape Design |
| |
|
|
Comparison of Digital Images and Compressed Video as Supplements in the Teaching of Floral Design. (August 2002)
Christine L. MacAlpine, M.S., Texas A&M University Chair of Advisory Committee: Dr. R. Daniel Lineberger A controlled study was performed to determine whether three methods of instruction resulted in similar student learning of floral design techniques. The traditionally taught introductory floral design lab was compared to two different Web-based methods. A Web site was created containing QuickTime video segments and a second site featured a sequence of digital images of floral design demonstrations. Each of the nine lab designs included information regarding history, usage, and floral materials needed. During the fall semester 2001, 35 Texas A&M University students were instructed by all three teaching methods in rotating groups. Learning was measured by the collection of a weekly design grade. Student learning style and preference surveys were conducted to gauge students' reaction to the different methods. Students in the traditional lab groups scored significantly higher than both video and digital image groups in design scores, and there was no significant difference between the video and digital image groups. Student grade point ratio appeared to have no correlation with increased design score, nor did the student's class rank, or lab section. In the student satisfaction survey students found the traditional lab the most enjoyable, followed by compressed video and then still image. When given a choice, 76.5% preferred traditional instruction. Learning floral design by still images caused the most frustration and anxiety when the three methods were compared. The majority of the class felt all three teaching methods provided an adequate learning experience and 80% would use the computer-assisted instruction as a supplement in a floral design lab. The results indicate that a single Web-based medium may not be an effective teaching method for a floral design lab. |
|
|
|
|
HORTICULTURE CLASSES HORT-101 CONCEPTS OF HORT SCNCE HORT-201 GENERAL HORTICULTURE HORT-203 FLORAL DESIGN HORT-206 WOODY ORNAMENTAL PLNTS HORT-207 LANDSCAPE PLANTS HORT-223 FLOWER QUALITY STNDRDS HORT-315 COMP ANLY HORT SYSTEMS HORT-325 VEGETABLE CR PRODUCTION HORT-326 PLANT PROPAGATION HORT-335 SOCIOHORTICULTURE HORT-400 FIELD STUDIES IN HORT HORT-425 LAND MAINT & CONSTRUCT HORT-435 URBAN HORTICULTURE HORT-423 TROPICAL HORTICULTURE HORT-432 HORT LANDSCAPE DESIGN HORT-481 SEMINAR HORT-484 INTERNSHIP HORT-489 SP TP PRIN PRAC VITICULT HORT-489 SP TP INTERIOR PLANTS HORT-604 APPL PHY HORT CROP HORT-605 INTERNET APPL FOR HORT
|
|
TECHNOLOGY CLASSES HORT-605 INTERNET APPL FOR HORT BANA-207 BUSNS DTA PRCSNG CNCPT AGED-611 ADV METHODS DISTANCE EDU ODED-606 OUTDOOR EXPERIENT ED
HORTICULTURE RELATED CLASSES
MISCELANIOUS CLASSES |
|
|
|||