Education information

M.S. in Horticulture, Study emphasis: Technology Assisted Learning
TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY, College Station, TX
GPR: 3.875

B.S. in Horticulture, Study emphasis: Urban Horticulture and Landscape Design
TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY, College Station, TX
GPR: 3.214

Thesis abstract

Comparison of Digital Images and Compressed Video as Supplements in the Teaching of Floral Design. (August 2002)
Christine L. MacAlpine, M.S., Texas A&M University
Chair of Advisory Committee: Dr. R. Daniel Lineberger

A controlled study was performed to determine whether three methods of instruction resulted in similar student learning of floral design techniques. The traditionally taught introductory floral design lab was compared to two different Web-based methods. A Web site was created containing QuickTime video segments and a second site featured a sequence of digital images of floral design demonstrations. Each of the nine lab designs included information regarding history, usage, and floral materials needed. During the fall semester 2001, 35 Texas A&M University students were instructed by all three teaching methods in rotating groups. Learning was measured by the collection of a weekly design grade. Student learning style and preference surveys were conducted to gauge students' reaction to the different methods. Students in the traditional lab groups scored significantly higher than both video and digital image groups in design scores, and there was no significant difference between the video and digital image groups. Student grade point ratio appeared to have no correlation with increased design score, nor did the student's class rank, or lab section. In the student satisfaction survey students found the traditional lab the most enjoyable, followed by compressed video and then still image. When given a choice, 76.5% preferred traditional instruction. Learning floral design by still images caused the most frustration and anxiety when the three methods were compared. The majority of the class felt all three teaching methods provided an adequate learning experience and 80% would use the computer-assisted instruction as a supplement in a floral design lab. The results indicate that a single Web-based medium may not be an effective teaching method for a floral design lab.

Classes

HORTICULTURE CLASSES
HORT-101 CONCEPTS OF HORT SCNCE
HORT-201 GENERAL HORTICULTURE
HORT-203 FLORAL DESIGN
HORT-206 WOODY ORNAMENTAL PLNTS
HORT-207 LANDSCAPE PLANTS
HORT-223 FLOWER QUALITY STNDRDS
HORT-315 COMP ANLY HORT SYSTEMS
HORT-325 VEGETABLE CR PRODUCTION
HORT-326 PLANT PROPAGATION
HORT-335 SOCIOHORTICULTURE
HORT-400 FIELD STUDIES IN HORT
HORT-425 LAND MAINT & CONSTRUCT
HORT-435 URBAN HORTICULTURE
HORT-423 TROPICAL HORTICULTURE
HORT-432 HORT LANDSCAPE DESIGN
HORT-481 SEMINAR
HORT-484 INTERNSHIP
HORT-489 SP TP PRIN PRAC VITICULT
HORT-489 SP TP INTERIOR PLANTS
HORT-604 APPL PHY HORT CROP
HORT-605 INTERNET APPL FOR HORT


TECHNOLOGY CLASSES
HORT-605 INTERNET APPL FOR HORT
BANA-207 BUSNS DTA PRCSNG CNCPT
AGED-611 ADV METHODS DISTANCE EDU
ODED-606 OUTDOOR EXPERIENT ED

HORTICULTURE RELATED CLASSES
AGED-340 PROF LDRSHIP DEVELOP
AGED-689 SP TP LDRSHP OF VOLUNTRS
BOTN-101 BOTANY
GENE-310 PRINCIPLES OF HEREDITY
PPHY-313 INTRO PLANT PHYSIOLOGY
PLPA-301 PLANT PATHOLOGY
ENTO-201 GENERAL ENTOMOLOGY
ENTO-405 HORT & FLOR ENTOMOLOGY
AGRO-301 SOIL SCIENCE
AGRO-302 RECREATIONAL TURF

MISCELANIOUS CLASSES
MGMT-211 LEG&SOC ENVIR OF BUSI
EHRD-679 CONTRACTS & GRANTS
STAT-651 STAT IN RESEARCH I